Transpired he could survive losing against Grimsby. He weathered losing a crucial European final against a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood losing at home against domestic rivals, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, undermining some of the club’s best academy products, the 32% win rate, calling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to engage. You come at Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.
Unfortunately, like many a Premiership defender in Blackburn’s championship campaign, Amorim took on the executive and seems to have missed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a manager who often railed his squad for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing in the face of the intense pressure and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most feared football executives.
In truth, this entire painful saga appears to portray the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his nine months of experience with the Saints, to view him as merely a functionary in the United exoskeleton: an individual who owed his position as much to his friendship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any demonstrable skill. How mistaken everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring United’s feted manager, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has proved himself to be among the sport’s true generals: a tactical intellect of which the club's mid-table rivals are now rightly wary.
To illustrate, it was Jason Wilcox who being involved in the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim originally, played a key role in attempting to convince him to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties faced pushback. However, these judgements hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth with the unimpeachable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of three England caps and a role in a title-winning side decades past.
Perhaps in time he might agree to explain his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise why Amorim is departing with a full payout, without any penalty clause in place. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – men like him – function at a level exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not the same as being prepared to comprehend it.
Naturally, in training our focus on the sporting director we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, merely executing the commands of his superior the billionaire owner, who in private has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to embrace analytics and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he declared that the team's approach to football “shall be decided by this group”.
After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate football matters, leveraging his background in industry and sailing. Above all he is incredibly rich, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply better. Whom else could one trust to manage an enlightened programme of austerity, the building of a modern arena that looks similar to an abstract design, the signing of a new striker?
This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to low-level employees such as coaches, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with ideas and drive to join a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have these guys set up? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Better by far to invest the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the tactics in the boardroom and appoint someone who can tailor their methods accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they are now more akin to delivery personnel: not really creating the food, yet finally accountable should it be delivered poorly or fails to meet standards.
In the meantime, their job has become not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his standing damaged while those individuals who appointed him live to blunder indefinitely.
And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply corporate governance at work: the elevation of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose decisions remain untouchable, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss him for using excessively that system. Hire the process guy and later discard him for requiring too long. And most importantly be grateful; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for the latest summer signings, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.
A tech journalist and AI researcher with over a decade of experience covering emerging technologies and their impact on society.